Auction Rate Securities
Auction Rate Securities have often been marketed by large brokerage firms as a safe, liquid alternative to money market funds. Investors are finding this is not always the case. |
Fight Investment FraudGreco & Greco’s attorneys are currently reviewing legal options including the filing of arbitration claims with investors who were sold auction rate securities. Common securities claims which may be applicable to the sale of these investments include securities fraud through misrepresentations and omissions, common law fraud and constructive fraud, suitability, breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, and failure to supervise. Auction Rate Securities FailuresAuction Rate Securities and Auction Rate Preferred Securities (ARS) are securities made up of long term bonds or preferred stock with variable interest rates and yields. The yields are periodically reset through Dutch auctions. ARS are often marketed and sold by a single dealer with the only resale market being through a successful auction. Problems have arisen in recent months as a result of the failures of the auctions, leaving investors in the lurch and unable to redeem the now illiquid securities. ARS have often been marketed by large brokerage firms as a safe, liquid alternative to money market funds. Investors believing they had their money in a safe liquid investment are understandably concerned by the failures in the marketplace for these securities, and our firm has been monitoring the situation closely and discussing the filing of arbitration claims with concerned individuals and businesses. Misrepresentations and omissions in the sale of a security can form the basis for a claim for securities fraud as well as other legal claims for recovery of damages. As recently as 2006, the SEC censured 15 of the largest brokerage firms for sales and auctions of Auction Rate Securities. As stated by the SEC in its press release, “since the firms were under no obligation to guarantee against a failed auction, investors may not have been aware of the liquidity and credit risks associated with certain securities.” The SEC further stated that “the firms violated Section 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, which prohibits material misstatements and omissions in any offer or sale of securities.” The fifteen firms which were censured were Bear, Stearns & Co., Inc., Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., Goldman Sachs & Co., J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc., Lehman Brothers Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated/ Morgan Stanley DW Inc., RBC Dain Rauscher Inc., A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc., Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc., Piper Jaffray & Co., SunTrust Capital Markets Inc., Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, and Banc of America Securities LLC. UBS appears to have been the first firm to actually begin lowering the values of auction rate securities on its customers’ statements, as reported by many news sources on March 29. Reuters reported that the markdowns could exceed 20 percent for some customers. Additional concessions from other firms may be forthcoming. Investors are understandably concerned regarding the lack of liquidity of these securities as well as the potential loss in value. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) released an Investor Alert on March 31, 2008 regarding auction rate securities which purports to set out various options for investors stuck with these products. FINRA, which claims to be a “trusted advocate for investors,” notably fails to mention contacting an attorney or filing an arbitration claim as options. If you are an investor who was sold Auction Rate Securities, and you would like to discuss your legal options with an attorney, please Contact Greco & Greco. |