FINRA
McLeod Ponzi Scheme Preys on Government Employees
The SEC filed an Emergency Complaint on June 24, 2010 against the Estate of Kenneth Wayne McLeod, F&S Asset Management Group, and Federal Employee Benefits Group, alleging that Mr. McLeod engaged in a ponzi scheme. The SEC release and Complaint can be found here. The Complaint alleges that Mr. Mcleod solicited federal government workers across the country to invest in a purported bond fund (the FEBG Bond Fund) which offered “guaranteed, tax-free returns of eight to ten percent annually in the fund.” In reality, the fund did not exist and Mr. McLeod used newly invested funds to pay off old investors, a classic ponzi scheme. Mr. McLeod raised $34 million from current investors.
According to this Florida Times Union article, Mr. McLeod killed himself days after confessing to investigators.
Mr. McLeod was a FINRA registered representative of Lincoln Financial Securities Corporation until May, 2010. Prior to Lincoln, Mr. McLeod was FINRA registered with Capital Analysts, Incorporated and Washington Square Securities. FINRA firms have legal responsibilities to supervise their registered representatives, and further may be found liable for the wrongful actions of their agents. Examples of legal grounds for liability of Broker-Dealers in these situations include:
a) under tort and agency law, principals can be found liable for the acts of their agents even if they are entirely innocent and have received no benefit from the transaction;
b) a broker’s Broker-Dealer can also be found liable as a “control person” of that broker under state and federal securities laws; and
c) claims can be pursued in arbitration based on violations of FINRA rules including Rules related to supervision, suitability, and outside business activities.
If you are a victim of the FEBG bond fund ponzi scheme, and you would like to discuss legal options with an attorney, please contact Greco & Greco for a free consultation with one of our lawyers.
Posted by Greco & Greco on 07/02 at 10:00 AM
Arbitration •
Brokerage Firms •
Capital Analysts •
Lincoln Financial Securities •
Washington Square Securities •
FINRA •
Ponzi Scheme •
Retirement •
SEC •
Suitability •
Permalink
Medical Capital Charged With Fraud by SEC
Medical Capital Holdings is another private placement investment that has been subject to claims of fraud by the SEC. In the Amended Complaint found on the Receivership site the SEC alleges that despite promises in the offering memoranda from Medical Capital not to use investor funds to pay administrative fees, 24% of investor funds were paid out as administrative fees, and the companies engaged in sham intercompany transactions to pay back principal and interest to investors in prior offerings.
Furthermore, as set out in this Orange County Register article, the head of Medical Capital (Sidney Field) had previously had his insurance license revoked by California, had been sued twice by state insurance regulators for racketeering and fraud, and had filed bankruptcy.
Investors who were sold these offerings by their stock brokers and have suffered losses may have claims that they can bring in FINRA arbitrations against their brokerage firms. Firms selling such offerings have due diligence duties prior to approval of their sale, and representatives are required to only make suitable recommendations to their customers. Additionally, representatives may not misrepresent the risk of securities they recommend, and they must disclose material facts related to risk. Greco & Greco is pursuing claims in arbitration on behalf of customers who were sold these products. If you think you may have a claim, please contact us for a free consultation with one of our attorneys.
Posted by Greco & Greco on 03/19 at 03:17 PM
Arbitration •
Brokerage Firms •
CapWest •
Gunn Allen •
FINRA •
Private Placements •
SEC •
Suitability •
Permalink
QUEEN SHOALS INVESTMENT FRAUD
According to this Western District of North Carolina Department of Justice release, Sidney Hanson of Charlotte, North Carolina pleaded guilty in July, 2009 to securities fraud, mail fraud, and money laundering in relation to an investment scheme known as Queen Shoals. The SEC has also filed a Complaint related to the investment scheme.
The SEC states in the above Complaint that the Hansons and their sales force sold almost $33 million in “private loan agreements” to investors around the country. The investments were allegedly to be placed in a diversified portfolio” of precious metals, foreign currency and treasury notes, generating high returns while remaining safe in non-depletion accounts. In reality according to the SEC, the investment funds were invested “in a number of very risky private investment opportunities” and funds from new investors were used to pay off old investors.
Investors who were sold Queen Shoals investments by their stockbrokers, investment advisers, retirement specialists, or financial planners may have claims to be brought against related firms based on securities fraud, suitability, failure to do due diligence, misrepresentations and omissions, and other legal grounds. Greco & Greco is currently investigating sales by FINRA registered parties in Virginia - please contact us for a free consultation if you believe you may have a claim.
Posted by Greco & Greco on 11/25 at 02:57 PM
Arbitration •
Brokerage Firms •
FINRA •
Ponzi Scheme •
Retirement •
SEC •
State Regulators •
North Carolina •
Suitability •
Unregistered Securities •
Permalink
Provident Royalties / Shale Royalties charged with fraud by SEC
As set out in this SEC Release, Provident Royalties, LLC and many related entities (including Shale Royalties entities) have been charged with engaging in a $485 million offering fraud and orchestrating a ponzi scheme. According to the SEC’s Complaint and release, “Provident falsely promised yearly returns of up to 18 percent,” and used investor funds from later offerings to pay “expenses related to earlier offerings and returns to investors in those offerings.” Unaffiliated brokerage firms were solicited by Provident to sell the investments through placement agreements for each offering, thereby selling the investments to retail investors nationwide.
Investors who were sold these offerings by their stock brokers and have suffered losses may have claims that they can bring in FINRA arbitrations against their brokerage firms. Firms selling such offerings have due diligence duties prior to approval of their sale, and representatives are required to only make suitable recommendations to their customers. Additionally, representatives may not misrepresent the risk of securities they recommend, and they must disclose material facts related to risk. Greco & Greco is pursuing claims in arbitration on behalf of customers who were sold these products. If you think you may have a claim, please contact us for a free consultation with one of our attorneys.
Posted by Greco & Greco on 11/13 at 05:12 PM
Arbitration •
Brokerage Firms •
CapWest •
Gunn Allen •
FINRA •
Ponzi Scheme •
Private Placements •
SEC •
Suitability •
Permalink
Auction Rate Securities Failures
Auction Rate Securities and Auction Rate Preferred Securities (ARS) are securities made up of long term bonds or preferred stock with variable interest rates and yields. The yields are periodically reset through Dutch auctions. ARS are often marketed and sold by a single dealer with the only resale market being through a successful auction. Problems have arisen in recent months as a result of the failures of the auctions, leaving investors in the lurch and unable to redeem the security. As set out in this SmartMoney article, ARS have been marketed as a safe, liquid alternative to money market funds. Investors believing they had their money in a safe liquid investment are understandably concerned by the failures in the marketplace for these securities, and our firm has been monitoring the situation closely and discussing the matter with concerned individuals and businesses. Misrepresentations and omissions in the sale of a security can form the basis for a claim for securities fraud as well as other legal claims for recovery of damages.
As recently as 2006, the SEC censured 15 of the largest brokerage firms for sales and auctions of Auction Rate Securities. As stated by the SEC in its press release, “since the firms were under no obligation to guarantee against a failed auction, investors may not have been aware of the liquidity and credit risks associated with certain securities.” The SEC further stated that “the firms violated Section 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, which prohibits material misstatements and omissions in any offer or sale of securities.” The fifteen firms which were censured were Bear, Stearns & Co., Inc., Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., Goldman Sachs & Co., J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc., Lehman Brothers Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated/ Morgan Stanley DW Inc., RBC Dain Rauscher Inc., A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc., Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc., Piper Jaffray & Co., SunTrust Capital Markets Inc., Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, and Banc of America Securities LLC. Read the SEC Order here.
UBS appears to be the first firm to actually begin lowering the values of auction rate securities on its customers’ statements, as reported by many news sources on March 29 including this Reuters article. Citing a Wall Street Journal article, Reuters reported that the markdowns could exceed 20 percent for some customers. Additional concessions from other firms may be forthcoming as the first quarter of 2008 ends.
State Regulators, including Massachusetts, have also begun investigations of the auction rate securities market with Massachusetts reportedly issuing subpoenas to UBS, Merrill Lynch, and Bank of America.
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) released an Investor Alert on March 31, 2008 regarding auction rate securities which purports to set out various options for investors stuck with these products. FINRA, which claims to be a “trusted advocate for investors,” notably fails to mention contacting an attorney or filing an arbitration claim as options. If you are an investor who was sold Auction Rate Securities, and you would like to discuss your legal options with an attorney, please Contact Greco & Greco.
Link to Securities-Lawyers.net Auction Rate Securities page.
Posted by Greco & Greco on 03/03 at 05:42 PM
Auction Rate Securities (ARS) •
Bonds •
Brokerage Firms •
A.G. Edwards •
Banc of America •
Bear Stearns •
Citigroup •
Deutsche Bank •
Ferris Baker Watts •
Lehman Brothers •
Merrill Lynch •
Morgan Keegan •
Morgan Stanley •
Piper Jaffray •
RBC Dain Rauscher •
Suntrust •
UBS •
Wachovia •
FINRA •
State Regulators •
Massachusetts •
Suitability •
Permalink
Morgan Stanley Fined Over Failure to Produce E-mails in Arbitrations
Morgan Stanley was fined $3 million and forced to pay $9.5 million in restitution to arbitration Claimants as a result of its failure to produce emails in response to document requests in arbitrations with customers. According to the FINRA press release, Morgan Stanley incorrectly represented in the arbitration proceedings that “the destruction of the firm’s email servers in the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on New York’s World Trade Center resulted in the loss of all pre-9/11 email.”
The unknown at this point is the amount of financial benefit gained by Morgan Stanley by this behavior through arbitration settlements and awards, and whether this benefit far exceeds the relatively small punishment ordered by FINRA.
Posted by Greco & Greco on 11/02 at 04:40 PM
Arbitration •
Brokerage Firms •
Morgan Stanley •
FINRA •
NASD Regulation •
Permalink
News from SEC’s Senior Summit
The SEC reported at its 2nd Annual Senior Summit that it was working on codifying suitability rules as they apply to recommendations for the purchase of securities by stock brokers, and further clarifying sales practice principals for investment professionals. If properly crafted, additional guidance in these areas should help prevent abuse of investors as well as provide additional tools for attorneys representing investors who have been abused by their stock brokers.
The SEC, FINRA, and state regulators also reported the results of their “free lunch” sweep of seminars targeted as seniors. The findings included 59% of the brokerage firms involved failing to properly supervise the seminars, and 23% of the seminars including advice that was unsuitably risky for senior investors.
Posted by Greco & Greco on 09/21 at 02:31 PM
FINRA •
SEC •
State Regulators •
Suitability •
Permalink
Morgan Stanley fined for corporate bond overcharges
As set out in this FINRA press release Morgan Stanley was fined and forced to pay restitution to retail customers for overcharging for corporate bond sales and for “having an inadequate supervisory system for monitoring the pricing of corporate fixed income securities sold to customers.”
Posted by Greco & Greco on 08/03 at 04:30 PM
Bonds •
Brokerage Firms •
Morgan Stanley •
FINRA •
Permalink